Zero as deep reference and topology
"For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him." Colossians 1:16
This website is a personal collection of insights based on first-hand experiences that involve the elevation of consciousness and the convergence of science and religion, and the transcendental nature of human consciousness. I provide a first-hand account of my journey of accepting the truth that there is one true God and how I came to this realization. The collection serves as a witness and testimony to my experiences, insights, and reflections. I also share personal descriptions of attempts to process the nature of consciousness itself.
My journey resulted from the hidden use of electromagnetic medical and scientific analysis, investigation, experimentation, utilization, validation, and verification. The collection of audio files is meant to inspire research and exploration into the nature of consciousness and the potential benefits of Neurotechnology.
I acknowledge that the journey has been difficult and painful, but it has also been transformative and enlightening. My hope is that these thoughts and insights offer hope and encouragement to those who may be struggling with their own beliefs or experiences and inspire further research into the nature of consciousness and the nature of their own transcendental journey therein. I express gratitude to God for guiding me through the journey and for giving me the strength to persevere through the challenges.
The collection also includes a quote from Dr. Carl Rogers, a prominent American psychologist, who emphasizes the importance of observation, hypothesis formation, and empirical testing in scientific inquiry, regardless of the level of sophistication or refinement of the methods used. Rogers warns against sterile pseudo-science that lacks direction and growth and emphasizes the importance of developing modes of inquiry in science. As such, Dr. Rogers' quote serves as a reminder that the convergence of science and religion is not an either-or proposition. Rather, it is a continuous journey towards greater understanding and wisdom, where both science and religion have a role to play.
"For example, it seems to me right and natural that in any new field of scientific endeavor the observations are gross, the hypotheses speculative and full of errors, the measurements crude." (Page 188)
“It is my opinion that the type of understanding which we call science can begin anywhere, at any level of sophistication. To observe acutely, to think carefully and creatively—these activities, not the accumulation of laboratory instruments, are the beginnings of science. To observe that a given crop grows better on the rocky hill than in the lush bottom land, and to think about this observation, is the start of science. To notice that most sailors get scurvy but not those who have stopped at islands to pick up fresh fruit is a similar start. To recognize that, when a person's views of himself change, his behavior changes accordingly, and to puzzle over this, is again the beginning of both theory and science. I voice this conviction in protest against the attitude, which seems too common in American psychology, that science starts in the laboratory or at the calculating machine.” (Page 188)
"A closely related belief is that there is a natural history of science — that science, in any given field, goes through a patterned course of growth and development. For example, it seems to me right and natural that in any new field of scientific endeavor the observations are gross, the hypotheses speculative and full of errors, the measurements crude. More important, I hold the opinion that this is just as truly science as the use of the most refined hypotheses and measurements in a more fully developed field of study. The crucial question in either case is not the degree of refinement but the direction of movement. If in either instance the movement is toward more exact measurement, toward more clear- cut and rigorous theory and hypotheses, toward findings which have greater validity and generality, then this is a healthy and growing science. If not, then it is a sterile pseudo science, no matter how exact its methods. Science is a developing mode of inquiry, or it is of no particular importance." (Page 188)
-- Dr. Carl Rogers, 1959
Rogers, C. (1959). Psychology: A Study of a Science. Study 1, Volume 3: Formulations of the Person and the Social Context (1240218084 920113051 S. Koch, Ed.). In Psychology: A study of a science (pp. 184-256). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Recently an article was released by Quanta Magazine titled Math’s ‘Oldest Problem Ever’ Gets a New Answer | Quanta Magazine wherein an excerpt caught my attention:
“More exactly, Erdős and Graham conjectured that any set that samples some sufficiently large, positive proportion of the whole numbers — it could be 20% or 1% or 0.001% — must contain a subset whose reciprocals add to 1. If the initial set satisfies that simple condition of sampling enough whole numbers (known as having “positive density”), then even if its members were deliberately chosen to make it difficult to find that subset, the subset would nonetheless have to exist.”
Disclosure: I am not a scholar or a math professional, I am simply someone who has (hypothetically) received fundamental knowledge and am sharing my own "hypothetical" insights as I notice and observe science, technology, physics and mathematics advance.
Thinking about the linguistic framework for the meaning of the word density in relation to zero. If zero means neutral density then the meanings of zero and density (as a construct) are relative. Wherein a zero reference leads to a quantum framework.
Meaning there is no referential integrity to any frame of perception without (quantum ?) reference (=intuition ?) Perhaps this may infer proper definitions of infinity, zero and one. Always dependent on vantage (and relativity).
Therefore perception and vantage both have relativity (parity/disparity) to wit, both are both as both are nested within the frames of parity embedded within frames of relativity aka “frameworks” (for vantage and perception) themselves as a topology (ecology?) of framing the hard problem within (and beyond) perception and cognition through the attributes of density such as “stop” (zero) AND “start” (one) bits, gates, switches, triggers and bridges offering a glimpse into accessing the tapestry of the quantum scaffold which ostensibly is within reach of each human mind and nervous system.
Everything to know is inside each one of us. That’s amazing, ergo, each human being is an example of the interface between infinity and unity (locality?) and each one of us have no idea how we are and yet we are and don’t know it, much less understand it, which could mean that topologies of perception and vantage may provide insight into the construct of relativity which one can then work with, within and without - as in perception and vantage - as neutral effects which may yield insight into both phenomenon's (perception and vantage) with intuition (both loaded and unloaded) serving as a parity stop/start bit for conscious perception (awareness?) or sub conscious perception (unloaded intuition?). This may further shed “light” (!) on wave-particle duality as a function of an unseen and unknown topography that math is beginning to dimly ascertain.
Put another way reference is critical when frameworking perception AND without it the veil of human ego obscures and obfuscates what is and isn’t AND zero is a deep reference within its own reference, type and topology, as the above research dimly shows the discerning reader, zero density is relative (quantum and scalar perhaps?) in addition to being (non) linear, logarithmic and (of course) additive.
In conclusion, this personal collection of reflections and insights is a testament to the power of the convergence of science and religion in the context of the transcendental nature of human consciousness. It serves as an invitation to recognize and accept the divine plan and coherence of our internal and external struggles, and to approach the hard problem of integrating science and religion with acute observation, creative thinking, and a continuous quest for greater understanding and wisdom. Thank you for taking the time to explore this collection.
Copyright 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 John Surmont All Rights Reserved